THE CRIMINAL CABAL

Conservative media, politicians and pundits have describing the impeachment effort by Congress to be a “soft coup de tat” carried out by the “deep state” in conjunction with the Democrat Party an effort to cancel the last election. Because, the pundits claim, the democratic presidential field is so thin, they are trying to smear Trump with an impeachment to improve their chances. Some say say this is pretty extreme talk, but does it really goes far enough to explain the vicious coordinated attacks on Trump since before he even took office?

Taken as a whole, the last three years plus actually show a coordination between the Democrat Party and the intrenched leftist bureaucracy (the deep state) to cover up Democrat corruption. The truly fearsome aspect we have seen emerge is that this criminal enterprise is protected by federal law enforcement, the justice Department and other national security agencies with all the terrifying tools they can bring to bear.

Let’s review what we all saw happen since Trump began to run for the Presidency. This criminal cabal was threatened with exposure when the Clinton's got caught conducting a phony charity to launder pay for play money, enabled by a private off the books email server. This threat of exposure was compounded when the separate exposure of DNC emails showed the unethical and corrupt campaign practices of the party. To our collective astonishment, The FBI, until that time thought by most Americans to be an unimpeachably honest law enforcement agency, went into to full coverup mode conducting the most flimsy and superficial “investigation” of the Clinton influence peddling scheme ever witnessed in the annals of American law enforcement.

Material witnesses were given immunity in return for nothing, search warrants were not issued, no grand jury was impaneled and, incredibly, the FBI assisted in the destruction of material evidence including computers and I phones of the key characters in the scandal. No investigation of what happened to the money that went to the charity took place and nothing came of the willful destruction of 33,000 emails by Hillary Clinton or the fact that classified information was found in Hillary’s emails that were not destroyed. Contrast that to Mueller later issuing two thousand subpoenas and 500 search warrants some enforced by early morning armed raids on lawyer’s offices and elderly couples in pajamas and putting those accused of white-collar crime in solitary confinement pending trial. The abuses were too many to even list them all here, but you all saw it right in front of your eyes.

It all would have been swept under the rug like so many other scandals before, like the IRS being used as a weapon against conservative political action groups, the DEA being used as a shill to run weapons illegally into to Mexico to exacerbate the drug wars under the guise of an investigation, using the Foreign surveillance authority to listen in on and unmask American Citizens, Using Libyan armaments to fuel civil war in Egypt and Syria to establish the Muslim brotherhood throughout the middle east; and, of course, Joe Biden selling out the country to Ukraine and China to benefit his son (and undoubtedly himself); but for one thing: Donald J. Trump.

During his 2016 campaign, Trump had the audacity to point out loudly the crimes of Clinton and by implication the festering corruption of the federal government as a whole, i.e. "the Swamp." If elected President he threatened to prosecute, which would have not only put Hillary in jail, but it would have exposed the depth of whole operation. The Democrats, in conjunction with the deep state, needed an “insurance policy” against the unlikely possibility Trump was elected. We now know they had one. The Clinton campaign and the DNC had funneled campaign funds through their lawyers, the Perkins Coy firm to Fusion GPS, then to former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and, ultimately, to Russian operatives to create a list of fraudulent smears against Trump, now known as "the Dossier.” This action alone consisted of several crimes, including illegal use of campaign funds, failure to properly disclose such uses, conspiring with foreign agents to influence an American election and leaks of classified information. This in turn was used to falsely accuse Trump of being a Russian patsy and to launch a phony investigation of Trump.

The Horowitz report confirms, the phony “dossier” was used by the FBI and DOJ to obtain FISA warrants against various members of the Trump campaign. Other crimes were committed in the process, including failure to report exculpatory evidence and even falsifying evidence to the FISA Court. Recall that the media scoffed at Trump’s assertion that he was being “wire tapped” during the campaign and when that was proved through exposure of the FISA warrants, then it was asserted that the phony dossier was not the only basis of the FISA warrants. We now know the dossier was the primary basis for the investigation and the FBI knew it was questionable and unverified from the beginning. The illegal use of the unmasking procedure also led to a setup of General Michael Flynn Michael Flynn and prosecution of him for lying to FBI agents about a phone call that was not itself illegal in any way.

The two-year Mueller fiasco was one of the most grotesques abuses of prosecutorial power ever witnessed, not surprisingly, carried out by Federal prosecutors known for their abuse of such power in prior cases. Although the media did everything in its power to prove the Russians somehow threw the election to Trump, the Mueller investigation actually showed there was at best infinitesimal involvement of the Russians while no serious investigation of the hacking of the DNC was ever conducted. Mueller never produced any additional evidence that the Russians were involved in hacking the DNC nor were the DNC computers independently examined. Ultimately there was virtually no evidence that any of the substantive allegations of dossier was true or that Trump had anything to do with Russian involvement the election.

After the Mueller investigation effectively stopped any serious investigation by Trump of the Clinton crimes, which was the true purpose, the deep state has now gone into full coverup mode to prevent any serious investigation into the Biden crimes. The current “investigation” into Trump’s Ukraine phone call has as its basis Trump's effort to begin a serious investigation of the Biden family crimes. It is patently obvious there is sufficient probably cause to believe Biden was engaged in a criminal abuse of power in Ukraine and that his actions should long ago have been the subject of an investigation if not indictment. Trumps actions in this regard were totally proper and legal yet it is now an impeachable crime to even suggest investigation of Biden's conflict of interest in Ukraine.

Biden himself has admitted in public that he used his authority to hold up American aid to Ukraine to force a prosecutor to be fired. That prosecutor has given in a sworn statement that he was at the time investigating the oil and gas company, Barisma, that was paying huge sums of money to Hunter Biden for no discernable services. Biden’s actions did have a personal motive, i.e. to protect Barisma from any serious investigation and thereby protect the huge flow of money to his son. There is no obvious reason why the firing of the prosecutor was in the interest of the American people. It was totally legitimate for President Trump to ask the current Ukrainian government to investigate presumptively criminal abuse of power by Joe Biden while Vice President.

Joe Biden does not become immune from investigation for potential crimes simply because he is running for President. The American people have a very legitimate and pressing reason to want to know whether Biden abused power for personal gain in the past not only because “no one is above the law” as the Democrats like to say, but also because it directly bears on his fitness for future public office. On the other hand, the Democrats, assisted by their deep state allies, have a pressing interest to make it appear that the Biden corruption is just an unfortunate appearance of a conflict of interest and that any effort to actually investigate this obvious corruption is itself the real crime.

The actions of the Democrats and the deep state over the last three plus years is more than a coincidence. These are planned coordinated actions of a massive and deep state acting in concert and on behalf of the Democratic crime machine. It is clear they will destroy anyone that attempts to expose its corruption or, as Trump puts it, to “drain the swamp”. Even an honest President cannot easily dismantle or even seriously damage this gigantic and deep criminal machine that is the Federal government

The Criminal cabal has come out of the closet and exposed itself since the 2016 election. It has demonstrated its pervasive power by continuing coverups involving Federal law enforcement and the even the Congress itself. We all know these facts. It’s open and obvious to all to see. Yet it is so out of the realm of what we have long believed that it’s difficult to accept what our common sense is telling us. We are all astonished and bewildered to witness how time after time the institutions we all have come to believe are fair and just have failed to enforce the law and appear to be protecting the guilty. It’s time to be honest with ourselves and admit the truth to ourselves. The government itself is the problem; no longer on our side, and a criminal cabal aligned against the people which will use all of the power of the government to protect the guilty and to prosecute anyone who stands in the way.

Comey had to Go!

James Comey was one of the most incompetent if not corrupt FBI directors in memory and that’s including J. Edgar Hover.  Comey has undermined American’s confidence in the criminal justice system (as did the Obama administration in general) and had to go.  Comey’s handling of both the Clinton investigation and the Russian hacking investigation were beyond incompetent and entered the realm of obstruction of justice.

In regard to the Clinton investigation, he publicly announced the fact that he did not find evidence of a prosecutable crime and exonerated Hillary Clinton and in so doing laid out a clear case of guilt.  Even the Democrats admitted this was improper as they resoundingly chimed in a chorus of calls for him to be fired at the time for this move.  (They were not criticizing him for exonerating Clinton in the face of clear evidence of guilt, but rather they criticized the fact that it was not the role of the FBI director to announce publicly the facts and conclusions regarding an investigation).  Nevertheless we both agree Comey’s actions were improper.  It is not the role of the FBI director to conclude guilt or innocence.  Rather, it is his role to gather the evidence and forward the same to a prosecutor or to present the facts to a grand jury for determination of whether there is probable cause to believe there is evidence of a crime.  In this case to find there was “extreme carelessness” when the legal standard of guilt is “gross negligence” is clearly to substitute his opinion for that of the judge and jury when there was obviously substantial evidence of guilt such that a jury should have decided the issues.   It is not the FBI’s director to decide guilt or innocence, it is merely to gather the evidence and, if there is probably cause to believe there is a crime, to refer it to the Justice Department for determination of whether to prosecute.   Comey’s job was not to determine whether there is guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is what he in fact did.

The espionage Act, which is what Comey was evaluating, requires only “gross negligence” in handling of classified information.  Comey laid out the facts of undisputed mishandling of classified information and determined that it was “extremely careless” but not “grossly negligent”.  Any lawyer who deals with such issues regularly knows that in the law that carelessness is the same thing as negligence and further that “extreme carelessness” is the same thing as “gross negligence”.  Gross negligence is just negligence or carelessness that is more than just and ordinary mistake but rather more extreme, i.e. extreme carelessness.   In fact most lawyers would agree that “extreme negligence” is probably more severe than “gross negligence” not less so.  On this statement alone, Comey was obligated to refer the case for prosecution but refused to do so, showing almost certainly a willful obstruction of Justice based on political bias.

Comey attempted to bolster his decision by claiming there was no evidence of intent to violate the espionage act and therefore there was no case.  This statement alone is more evidence of incompetence or willful obstruction of justice.  Intent is not an element of the crime.  Gross negligence is a standard that does not require proof of intent.  Negligence by definition is an act that is not necessarily done intentionally or with a bad motive but rather “extremely carelessly”. [1]   The very reason the standard in the act is “gross negligence “ is so that prosecutors do not have to prove an intent to break the law, so that people mishandling government secrets can’t go free and unpunished simply by claiming it was an accident and not intentional.  The standard is gross negligence or negligence that is so flagrant that an ordinary person would know that there could be bad consequences or that it could cause harm. In this case it would be obvious to an ordinary person that conducting business of the United States government on a private server instead of secure US government servers could lead to breaches of national security

Even so, contrary to Comey’s claim, there was substantial evidence of consciousness of guilt.  Hillary chose to do, not just some, but all of her communicating as Secretary of State through a private e-mail server which she knowingly had set up in her home, contrary to the recommendations of the President and her own directives to her own staff at State.  These recommendations were obviously to protect classified information from leaks.  Then, after leaving office, she failed to deliver the government communications on her computer to the government for years and contrary to law, and even though she knew there was a congressional investigation into matters reflected in those records.

Later, it had been leaked through independent sources that Harvey Wiener, husband of Uma Abadan, Hillary’s closest aid, had substantial State Department e-mails including classified documents on his computer.  It is now been verified that Abadan was regularly e-mailing documents including classified information to Wiener’s computer, according to her because she could more easily download them in hard copy at night for delivery to Hillary the next day.   This was obviously a straight forward criminal violation of the Espionage Act.

Comey was forced to reopen the investigation of Clinton to “investigate” this bombshell disclosure.  This was right before the election and the news was devastating to Clinton, but the quick turn around by Comey disclosing that the investigation showed nothing new and the issue was closed.   Obviously, Comey’s action was not taken to harm Clinton, as Democrats now allege, but rather a whitewash was intended to close down the very harmful disclosure that Clinton’s closest aid was a security leak and possibly a foreign agent. 

During this re-opened investigation, it was widely reported that Comey made an agreement with Clinton’s top aids for them to deliver their computers for examination for e-mails that might include classified information.  Remember, since Clinton had been conducting all business through an unsecure server, sending and receiving e-mails including classified information, an examination of her aids’ computers may have shown how this classified information was getting into the system and where it ultimately was going, including to possibly unfriendly actors.
Astonishingly, rather than subpoena the computers, Comey agreed with the aids, through their lawyers, that if they voluntarily produced the computers, after examination he would destroy the computers and anything copied from them. Again, the function of law enforcement, including the FBI, is not to be judge and jury and then to destroy evidence; but rather to gather and preserve it for examination by the prosecutors or a grand jury who make the ultimate decision whether to prosecute or not.  Subsequent disclosures have now shown that Comey had written his exoneration lspeech regarding Clinton before even the witnesses were interviewed.  Text messages of the lead investigators show they knew the fix was in and there would never be a prosecution of Hillary regardless of the evidence.  This action by Comey was clear obstruction of justice for which he should not only have been fired but also loose his license to practice law and be prosecuted for obstruction of justice.

Incredibly this is not all of the incompetence and out right obstruction of justice by Comey.  In the Russian hacking investigation, he clearly was obstructing justice as well.  The basis of the Alleged Russian hacking is an evaluation of the computers at the DNC.  Supposedly the DNC’s computer security firm, Crowd Strike discovered the Russian connection from their own evaluation of the computers.  Crowd strike, in addition to being the DNC’s own security firm is heavily controlled by Alphabet, Inc, a/k/a Google, which is a staunch Hillary supporter and devoted Trump opponent.  Any person charged with colluding with the Russians to meddle in the election by hacking the DNC would immediately attack the Crowd strike story as nothing more than a partisan sham.

When the DNC announced the Crowd Strike conclusions that the Russia’s did it, Comey has admitted in testimony and statements that he asked the DNC to produce the computers for an independent evaluation and that the DNC refused.  The fact that the DNC refused raised the suspicion if not outright presumption that the DNC and Crowd Strike are lying.  Comey failed to follow up with subpoena’s for the computers or in the alternative to reject the DNC’s claims without any firm proof.    I’m not saying here that the Russian cold not in fact be the hacker, but with the DNC refusing to allow an independent examination of the records, suggests they are lying and the failure of the FBI to subpoena those records to force an independent examination, show either criminal negligence or active participation in a phony political which hunt against the political opposition.

But wait there is much, much more known facts about Comey’s lack of competence or political motivation contrary to the best interests of the American people.  Comey oversaw the elimination of all FBI and other government materials mentioning Radical Islam as a source of domestic terror attacks, in conjunction with the Muslim Brotherhood, the father of terrorist activity world wide.     On his watch multiple known terrorists carried out acts of terror While the FBI failed to take any action against them including any electronic surveillance through the FISA court.  Meanwhile we now know Comey was participating in the illegal unmasking of millions of innocent Americans suspected of nothing other than being political opponents of the Obama administration.  Essentially we now know Comey clogged up the available avenues of proper criminal investigation with illegal political surveillance of the innocent while criminals went un checked to carry out mass murder against the American people.

In fact, Comey was a part of the far-reaching Clinton political crime syndicate that he profited by and he was advanced by this association throughout his career.  He was in all likelihood promoted to FBI director just as Hillary Clinton was leaving the State Department precisely to provide political cover for her and Clinton, Inc. and possibly the entire Obama administration’s criminal activity.   But this is a far too lengthily discussion for this article. [2]

The bottom line is, we now know Comey was in the tank for Clinton and threw perhaps the biggest criminal investigation of the century and perhaps in US hoisotry for political reasons and was rightfully fired for it.  Now, incredibly, his buddy, Robert Mueller, has been appointed to try to cover it up even further and ultimately oust Trump from the Presidency in the process.
-------------------------------
[1] The United States Supreme court considered the standard for awards of punitive damages in civil cases and discussed the difference between intentional conduct and “extremely careless conduct and “gross negligence in:  Smith v. Wade, 103 S.Ct. 1625, 461 U.S. 30, 75 L. Ed.2d 632 (1983).  The Court said:

   “One fundamental distinction is essential to an understanding of the differences among the various standards for punitive damages. Many jurisdictions have required some sort of wrongful motive, actual intention to inflict harm or intentional doing of an act known to be unlawful--"express malice," "actual malice," "bad faith," "wilful wrong" or "ill will."   Other states, however, have permitted punitive damage awards merely upon a showing of very careless or negligent conduct by the defendant--"gross negligence," "recklessness," or "extreme carelessness." In sharp contrast to the first set of terms noted above, which connote a requirement of actual ill will towards the plaintiff, these latter phrases import only a degree of negligence. This distinction between acts that are intentionally harmful and those that are very negligent, or unreasonable, involves a basic difference of kind, not just a variation of degree. W. Prosser, Torts § 34, at 185 (4th ed. 1971); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 500, comment f (1965). The former typically demands inquiry into the actor's subjective motive and purpose, while the latter ordinarily requires only an objective determination of the relative risks and advantages accruing to society from particular behavior. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 282.”

[2]See:  https://bigleaguepolitics.com/james-comeys-brother-works-law-firm-clinton-foundations-taxes/.  See also https://www.snopes.com/comey-clinton-foundation/  for the leftist perspective on this. (Note: Snopes attempts to exonerate Comey, and thereby Clinton, in this “fact check” article, but, in so doing, omits several key facts from its analysis.  For example,  that Comey was head legal officer for Lockeed-Martin, not just some miscellaneous employee when the Clinton Foundation donations were made; or that the Big League article clearly identifies the connection between Comey’s brother, Peter, and the Clinton Foundation audit and offers eye-witness proof.   In addition, Snopes repeatedly asserts there is no proof of any benefit received by Comey from the Clinton Foundation when obviously his employer benefited to the tune of 17 government contracts and he got 6 million from them for his efforts and ultimately was appointed FBI Director by Obama.  Since when do liberals have trouble imagining how high ranking corporate officers benefit from engaging in unethical or illegal activity on behalf of the company to increase profits?  Snopes does nevertheless admit; and thus verifies the key connections between Comey and the Clinton Foundation and then asks you to suspend your common sense to think this had no impact on his decisions made while investigating Clinton’s private server, which was obviously set up to hide Clinton Foundation connections to State Department favors in the first place!  

Muslim Brotherhood for Obama and Hillary

            You frequently hear liberals expressing their fear that Donald Trump is a Nazi, as a reason why they support Hillary.   It is ironic that the Democratic Party is actually aligned with the modern embodiment of the fascist Nazi regime and its supremacist philosophy; and that the pronouncements of Donald Trump that most concern these people are his pronouncements of his desire to protect the United States from these Modern day Nazi fanatics. 

            The Muslim Brotherhood is a huge worldwide organization that is guided by a supremacist-fascist philosophy.  It has insinuated itself into the United States and, it is a major player in the Democratic Party.
               

     One of the original founders of the Muslim Brotherhood, Amin Al Husseini, was directly involved in the Ottoman Empire’s Genocide of 1.5 million mostly Christian Armenians and other Christians during WWI.  After WWI he helped form the Muslim Brotherhood as a vehicle to re-establish the Islamic Caliphate that carried out this genocide, a pure Islamic State purged of all Christians and Jews.  The Muslim Brotherhood became a close ally of Adolph Hitler and his Nazi party in WWII.

        He was posted in Berlin throughout the war and helped raise two Waffen SS units (Hitlers most committed fanatics) of approximately 100,000 troops each to support Hitler’s war effort and the implementation of the “final solution”.    The photo below shows Husseini inspecting his Muslim  SS troops.  In fact it is widely reported that Hitler would have been content to deport the Jews to Palestine and was planning to do so, but Husseini objected on the basis that the Muslims did not want them in Arab lands and actually conceived of and suggested the “final solution” to Hitler as an alternative.

            Husseini survived WWII and created the Muslim Congress and other pan Islamic organizations on behalf of the Broitherhood.  The Muslim Brotherhood of today is the exact same entity with the same goals and aims.  The Brotherhood is the father organization of all Islamic terrorist organizations in the world.  It is the direct and openly admitted parent organization of Hamas, which is the Palestinian organization dedicated to the eradication of Israel.  Hamas to this day retains the Nazi salute as its official salute.   An example of Hamas fighters giving the Nazi salute is shown below, but similar photos and others showing members holding signs supportive of Hitler are legion on the internet.  Check it for yourself.  See the photo below.

            But what does this have to do with the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton being more associated with Fascism and Hitler-esq philosophy than Donald J. Trump? 

            First, Hillary Clinton’s closest advisor and largest financial supporter and a person who funds numerous front organizations that advocate a global socialist state, George Soros, admittedly was a Nazi collaborator during WWII in occupied Hungary.  His God Father, with whom he lived during the war, was directly involved on behalf of the Nazi in liquidating the estates of Jews sent to concentration camps.  Soros describes it as the best time of his life.  He claims that if he was not involved then someone else would have been liquidating the estates.  Soros is openly anti-US and admits he is dedicated to the reduction of American power and influence in the world.  But why would the Democratic Party in general and Hillary Clinton in particular seek out this man to be her biggest supporter and closest advisor if she did not agree with his anti-American opinions?

            The Clinton Foundation’s biggest contributor is Saudi Arabia, although opposed to the Muslim Brotherhood within its borders, It has an agreement with the Muslim Brotherhood that as long as the MB stays out of Saudi Arabia, then the Kingdom will support the Islamic supremacist philosophy and its goal of spreading Islamic supremacism throughout the world.

            Her closest personal aid, with whom she suddenly and inexplicably developed a personal magnetism and a deep personal relationship, is a Saudi Arabian Muslim with family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.  Huma was listed as editor of her mother’s journal “the Minority Muslim” that advocates submission of women to men, a philosophy directly opposed to the philosophy espoused publicly by Hillary Clinton on the issue of women’s rights.  Again, why would Hillary Clinton, a person who advocates for women’s rights find such an anti feminist person with ties to a fascist organization, to be her closest person confidant with who she has an in-explicably deep personal connection?  

Huma Abedin, raised in Saudi Arabia, Hillary's closest personal aid

             See “The Huma Unmentionables” at the National Review for a detailed description of the association of Huma and the Muslim Brotherhood and the deep influence she has had over Hillary.  Below, Hillary signs autographs of students at Huma’s mother’s (to her left) girls school in Saudi Arabia

            Emails of Hillary Clinton disclosed as a result of the Bengazi investigation show that, as Secretary of state, she worked years in advance of the Arab Spring organizing groups in preparation for the uprising, including groups associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, in a effort to depose Hosni Mubarak, long supported by the US because of his opposition to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and to destabilize Lybia and Syria to create the Arab Spring and bring the Brotherhood to power (which she and Barak Obama had designated as a moderate influence in the Middle East.)    In fact reports show that there is no moderate rebel group in Syria and that the Muslim Brotherhood and its radical terrorist affiliates are in fact the opposition and that Obama and Hillary were funneling aid and arms knowingly to these groups through the facade of a moderate “people’s revolution.”

            After the Arab Spring erupted in Egypt and Mubarak was deposed, a popular election was held, in which the Muslim Brotherhood was popularly elected to power by a wide margin.  This shows the fascist supremacist philosophy of the Muslim Brotherhood and its support of terror to achieve its goals is not some minor and unusual belief system of the far fringe but rather widely accepted view among Muslims in the Middle East.

            Clinton and Obama were immediately and enthusiastically supportive of the Muslim Brotherhood.   Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2012 called the election of Egypt’s Islamist Muslim Brotherhood leader a “milestone” for Egyptian democracy and offered covert police and security help, according to declassified State Department documents.  A nine-page document, once-labeled “Secret,” listed talking points for Clinton’s meeting with newly-elected Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi on July 14, 2012, including that Morsi’s election was a key step toward popular democracy in the strategic North African state. 

Hillary Clinton meeting with MB member, Pres. Morsi of Egypt

“We stand behind Egypt’s transition to democracy,” the heavily-redacted Clinton talking points state, adding that the only way to maintain a strong Egypt is “through a successful transition to democracy.” Clinton then meant to offer Morsi American technical expertise and assistance from both the U.S. government and private sector to support his economic and social programs. Clinton’s talking points also included an offer of secret assistance to help Morsi to “upgrade and reorient Egypt’s police force toward serving the needs of a democratic people.” The offer included sending a team of U.S. police and security experts to Egypt as part of a “framework of cooperation” that would be carried out “quite discretely.”  Also, the talking points reveal Clinton was ready to help launch an Egyptian-American Enterprise Fund, a private sector initiative of U.S. and Egyptian investors to help Egyptian businesses. The fund was to be launched with $60 million and would later involve Congress adding $300 million over five years.  The fund was created in September 2012.

            A second State Department document revealed that Deputy Secretary of State Thomas R. Nides wrote to Morsi on Sept. 24, 2012 seeking collaboration with the Egyptian leader on Syria and Iran.  “It was a honor to meet with you in Cairo,” Nides wrote in the letter. “ Both documents reveal that the State Department under Clinton had little understanding of the Islamist threat posed by the Muslim Brotherhood and its branches or were unconcerned about  its radical views.

            Andrew C. McCarthy, former assistant U.S. attorney in New York who prosecuted Islamist terrorism cases, said Clinton backed the Muslim Brotherhood over the Egyptian military, stating it was imperative that power be turned over to the winner of the election.  “The defining mission of the Muslim Brotherhood is the implementation of sharia,” McCarthy said. Sharia is Islamic law that critics say is antidemocratic and contrary to fundamental rights and freedoms.  The documents were released under a Freedom of Information Act request seeking information on the Obama administration’s secret 2011 Presidential Study Directive-11, or PSD-11. (See: the independent Sentinel Article, “Documents show a Feckless Secretary Clinton Backed the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt” Oct 13, 2016, and photo below taken from that article showing Clinton meeting with Muslim Brotherhood party leader and elected Egyptian President Muhammad Morsi.   The directive, according to officials familiar with its contents, outlined how the administration would seek to support the Muslim Brotherhood around the world despite the Islamist supremacist organization providing the ideological underpinning for jihadist terrorism for both al Qaeda and its successor, the Islamic State.

            Violence against Egypt’s significant Christian minority almost immediately erupted under the Muslim Brotherhood. Church burnings, harassments rapes, assaults and out right killings of Christians skyrocketed.   The new regime began the process of resigning Egypt’s secular constitution and began reversing the peace treaty with Israel.  Ignoring these grotesque signs of an emerging fascist state, Obama immediately committed to a large infusion of American weapons to the new regime.  When as a result of these unlawful abuses, the military, which, thankfully, all former Presidents of the United States had invested years and billions of dollars training in anti- Islamic thought and secular tolerance, rebelled and overthrew this Muslim Brotherhood fascist monsters.  Obama and Hillary Clinton were outraged and openly protested the unlawful overthrow of the popularly elected fascist Brotherhood.

Egyptians protest Clinton's pro Muslim Brotherhood policies

             U.S. backing for Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt was derailed by the Egyptian military a year after the meeting.  Morsi, the first democratically elected head of state in Egyptian history, was ousted in a coup after he had sought to consolidate power by granting himself unlimited authority in what pro-democracy critics called an Islamist coup.  Egyptian military leaders arrested Morsi on July 3, 2013, after protesters took to the streets to oppose his rule. Abdel Fattah al-Sisi headed a military government and was later elected president.    Obama opposed the new pro western and secular government.  There is significant anti Obama and anti Clinton sentiment among Egyptians who opposed the MB's agenda of imposing an Islamic state and recognized the significant support of the islamists given by Clinton and Obama.  The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt has issued a statement that the election of Donald Trump

            After the 9/11/2001 the Bush FBI investigated possible terror links of various organizations and groups in the US.  The investigation led to the prosecution and conviction in 2009 of the Holy land Foundation as a fund raising organization for Hamas with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.  In the suit there were a number of unindicted co-conspirators named as being part of the Muslim Brotherhood network operating within the USA, Including notably the Counsel on American Islamic Relations, (CAIR).    CAIR is an outspoken Islamic apologist organization and constantly protester of the alleged and so-called Muslim backlash.  It was proven that CAIR is a integral part of the overall Islamic supremacy strategy of creating a war of terror against the mainstream non Islamic community and all other religious groups, while at the same time through other organizations using media and local law against discrimination to thwart effective investigation and law enforcement against its activities.

            Barak Obama took office in 2009.  Bush’s Justice Department planned the Holy Land prosecution to be just the beginning of the prosecutions and to move forward to the unindicted co-conspirators with actual prosecutions of them.  Barak Obama in secret meetings stopped any further investigation or prosecution thus clearing the way for unfettered Muslim Brotherhood activities within the USA.

            A year-long investigation by the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) has found that scores of known radical Islamists made hundreds of visits to the Obama White House, meeting with top administration officials.  Court documents and other records have identified many of these visitors as belonging to groups serving as fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and other Islamic militant organizations.  See: “A Red Carpet for Radicals at the Whitehouse by the Investigative Project on Terrorism at investigativeproject.org.  Below is a composit of photos the IPT identifies as Muslim Brotherhood operatives with significant contacts with the Obama administration.

            Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton have a long and history of close ties with individuals and groups who are actual, not just imiagined, facists with direct connections to Hitler's Nazi state and his facist suprmeist philosohpy. The loosely thrown around allegations of the about Donald Trump have no historic or factual basis, but rather are either deliberate disinformation or suppositions, drawn by the uninformed.   The Brotherhood knows how to deflect criticism and turn it around on the accusors and the truth tellers.  Propaganda was invented by the fascists.  

            Post Script: The Muslim Brotherhood planned a demonstration in Cairo to support he election of Hillary Clinton and to oppose the western leaning secular government of the Asisi that over throw the elected Muslim Brotherhood government. Elements of the current pro western government hailed the election of Trump, obviously indicating the lack of support from Obama and Hillary.  The Muslim Brotherhood announced that the election of Trump was a disaster for Islamism.  No kidding.  Their best ally was defeated.

OBAMA SHEDS A TEAR

            President Obama shed a tear while discussing the Sandy Hook shooting during his speech on his plan to increase background checks for gun purchases to an area with almost no known relationship to gun crimes, i.e. private sales and gun collector purchases.  Sandy Hook was horrifying, however, the reforms have nothing to do with how that crime occurred.  On the other hand, having said that…

            I did not hear that in his speech, that he also apologized to the families for his administration negligently conducting a background check on the shooter in the June 2015 Charleston South Carolina Church shooting.  Nine people died and one seriously injured because the sale was approved even though the shooter had a record, which prohibited the sale as a matter of law.  Obama’s FBI sheepishly admitted the mistake.  I would be more inclined to believe Obama’s tears were sincere if he had said he is firing those responsible for the mistake and that he is improving the system of back ground checks that already exist; but Obama has made no such changes and made no apology. 

            I would have been more inclined to believe his tears were sincere if he had apologized to the families for the July 2015 Lafayette, Louisiana theater shooting which killed 2 and wounded 9, carried out by a shooter with a history of mental health commitment and crimes prohibiting him from purchasing a hand gun as a matter of law, but negligently approved for purchase of the gun used.  Similarly, no tears and no apology heard yet.

            I even would have been more convinced by his tears if accompanied by an apology for the 12 deaths and multiple wounded in the December 2015 San Bernardino, CA Christmas party shooting carried out by a Pakistani woman from Saudi Arabia who would not have been in this country but for his policy prohibiting the State Department from checking publicly available social media posts of visa applicants, even though a thorough vetting of the applicants’ backgrounds was required by law.  Because of this reckless policy, the State Department was prohibited from finding the numerous public posts by the shooter supporting ISIS made prior to her approval for entry into the US on a  “fiancée” visa, and thus approved her for entry into the US.   I would have been even more impressed if the apology had included Obama’s promise to terminate this policy immediately; but, alas, no tears and no apology heard so far.  The outrageous policy is still in effect; and it is unknown who or how many will die before he admits the mistake.

            I would have been more willing to consider the tears genuine if they accompanied an apology for “Fast and Furious” where his ATF department (with approval of his Attorney General) authorized approximately 1,500 otherwise illegal sales of mostly semi-automatic assault rifles, and turned a blind eye to illegal smuggling of those weapons into Mexico, where they were used in at least dozens of murders and eventually used to murder a US border patrol officer.  The program resulted in no major arrests or significant disruptions of any drug trafficking or gun smuggling operations;  but, before the operation was exposed, oddly coincidentally, Hillary Clinton, then Obama’s Secretary of State, did use the outbreak of violence in Mexico caused by these illegal guns to repeatedly call for limitation on manufacture of guns in the US. 

            Perhaps the President could have gotten a little dewy eyed as he apologized  to the families of the dead for refusing to enforce Federal immigration law, by cracking down on the sanctuary cities that are knowingly refusing to honor Federal Detainer Orders even in regard to violent criminal aliens resulting in multiple deaths including the murder of Kathryn Steinle in San Francisco on July 1, 2015 by an illegal alien with multiple felonies and an outstanding detainer order.  Obama has taken no action and stridently demanded full funding for this lawlessness and contempt for the will of the American people.

            Perhaps he could have choked up a little as he apologized to the Ameican People as a whole for lying when he recently pardoned thousands of Federal inmates claiming they were non violent, when a review of the records now shows many had convictions on crimes involving guns.  Time will tell, but statistics show a high recidivism rate among such convicts and early release will surely result in many more violent crimes than otherwise would have been the case.  Perhaps a condolence in advance to the victims and their families would have been in order.

            I would have been really impressed if I had heard Obama apologized to the world as a whole for his gun running operation through the American Consulate and CIA outpost in Benghazi to, supposedly, moderate Syrian rebels who actually turned out to be radicals associated with various terrorist groups that eventually became ISIS, “the JV team”.  And while he was at it, perhaps he would have shed a tear as he apologized for pulling US troops out of Iraq too early leaving over a billion dollars worth of military grade armaments behind with inadequate security which ultimately fell into the hands of ISIS as well; all of which lead to beheadings, crucifixions, immolations, torture, rape and enslavement of hundreds of thousands and dislocation of millions.  And, perhaps he could even have outright sobbed as he admitted that the resulting mass immigration into Europe has caused devastating consequences there, including the mass assaults and rapes of German women that occurred just this New Year’s eve carried out by the “refugee’s” he inflicted on those countries.

            Perhaps maybe he would shed a tear while he apologized for, instead of sending aid overseas, bringing thousands more un-vetted Syrian and unknown other Middle Eastern nationals to the US and inflicting unknown numbers of Islamist sympathizers on the unsuspecting and innocent American people; and, while he was at it, admitted that the San Bernardino massacre he negligently allowed to happen had proved to him the stupidity of thinking he could adequately vet these people; that bringing them here presents much too great a risk for the American people, and that, therefore, he is going to stop his reckless policy of accepting more unknown, unidentified Middle Eastern Muslims into the US as “refugees.”

            But no; the sad fact is that none of these apologies were forthcoming.  The real tears have been and will be shed by the wounded, the families’ of the dead, and the soon to be dead, wounded, raped and abused, and their fellow Americans who grieve with them and shed tears, not only for them, but because they can not believe this is their President.