After six years of claiming the Bush administration gave tax cuts only to the wealthy and ignored the middle class, Obama is now arguing the middle class tax cuts of Bush need to be extended to save the middle class from economic devastation. Moving right along with the subject of Democratic misrepresentations over the last eight years, look at the O.M.B. graph at the top left of this article. This graph shows the deficit since 2003 and shows the spending on the Iraq war insofar as it impacted the budget.
First, note that the total spending on the war, accumulated over the six years from 2003 through 2008, Bush’s last year in office, totals less than Obama’s stimulus package passed in his first four months in office. This contradicts Obama's often cited claim that he inherited huge deficits from Bush caused by the Iraq war.
Thirdly, note that, although the deficit was about $400 billion in 2003, it steadily decreased over the next five years to around $200 billion in 2007. The graph shows the cumulative effect of the tax cut was not to drive deficits up over the long haul, but, rather, to increase tax revenues as the economy responded by increasing earnings, thus gradually bringing deficits down. This directly contradicts Obama's claims that the tax cuts did nothing to stimulate the economy or to reduce deficits over time.
It is true that the deficits begin to sky rocket in 2008 to $400 billion; however, as we know, 2008 is the fist full year the Democrats controlled both the House and the Senate, and, as such, controlled spending. This was the year of TARP. Democrats supported TARP, and almost all real Republicans in the House and the Senate, voted against it. Obama repeatedly complains that he inherited a huge deficit from Bush, but he was a Senator who voted for iTARP and the rest of the budget at the time. In 2009 the deficit doubles to $1.4 trillion under the Democratic Congress and Obma's first year as President (a four fold increase) and stayed almost that high in the current year, 2010.
There is no doubt the economy was sliding into a deep recession in late 2008. But, this was not caused by tax cuts nor was it caused by deficit spending. It is well recognized that the 2008 recession was caused by a housing bubble bursting and a resulting credit crisis. This was caused by Govenment efforts to over stimulate lending and home ownership, not by ordinary free market forces. In fact Obama claims hyper-deficit spending is what we need to get out of the recession. Thus, he impossibly argues Bush's deficits were the cause of the recession but Democrat's deficits are the cure.
Democrats are misrepresenting basic economic fact. Reduction of government, by tax and spending cuts and reducing administrative burdens are the only measures that will work to unleash the economy. Unfortunately, instead, Obama and the Democratic Congress are passing one multi billion dollar bailout to government workers and unions after another and piling on new entitlement programs.
If there is not a massive take over of the house and Senate by real Conservatives, instead of RINO Republicans, this recession will be a long one.
